Marxism–Leninism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In political science, Marxism–Leninism is the ideology combining Marxist socio-economic theory and Leninist political praxis, which was the official ideology of the Soviet Union, of the political parties of the Communist International, and of Stalinist political parties.[1] The purpose of Marxism–Leninism is the revolutionary development of a capitalist state into a socialist state, effected by the leadership of a vanguard party of professional revolutionaries from the working class and from the proletariat. The socialist state is realised by the dictatorship of the proletariat, which determines policy with democratic centralism.[2][3]

Politically, Marxism–Leninism establishes the communist party as the primary social force to organise society into a socialist state, which is the intermediate stage of socio-economic development towards a communist society that is stateless and classless, and features common ownership of the means of production, accelerated industrialisation, concentrated research-and-development of the scientific and technologic productive forces of society;[4] nationalisation of the country's natural resources and agricultural land, and public control of societal institutions.[5]

In the late 1920s, Joseph Stalin established ideologic orthodoxy in the Soviet Union and the Communist International with his term Marxism–Leninism, which redefined the theories of Lenin and Marx, and established Marxist–Leninist praxis for the exclusive benefit of the Soviet Union.[6][7] In the late 1930s, the publication of the official textbook The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks) (1938), by Stalin, made the term Marxism–Leninism common usage among communists and non-communists.[8]

Critical of the Stalinist model of communism in the Soviet Union, the American Marxist Raya Dunayevskaya and the Italian Marxist Amadeo Bordiga dismissed Marxism–Leninism as a type of state capitalism,[9] stating that (i) Marx had identified state ownership of the means of production as a form of state capitalism—except under certain socio-economic conditions, which usually do not exist in Marxist–Leninist states;[9][10] (ii) that the Marxist dictatorship of the proletariat is a form of democracy, therefore the single-party rule of a vanguard party is undemocratic;[11] and (iii) that Marxism–Leninism is neither Marxism nor Leninism, nor a philosophic synthesis, but an artificial term that Stalin used to personally determine what is communism and what is not communism.[12]

Background[edit]

Leninism[edit]

Within five years of the death of Lenin, in 1924, Joseph Stalin was the Government of the Soviet Union, who flouted the socialist principles of Lenin and Marx as political expediencies used to realise his plans for Russia and for world socialism; most contradicted Lenin's plans for Russia.[13] Stalin justified his régime with his book Concerning Questions of Leninism (1926), which presented Marxism–Leninism as a separate communist ideology, which featured an omniscient leader;[7] as such, Stalinism later became the official state ideology of the Soviet Union.[14]

Stalinism[edit]

As Stalin's opposition within the Russian Communist Party and the Soviet government, Leon Trotsky and the Trotskyists argued that Stalin's Marxist–Leninist ideology contradicted Marxism and Leninism in theory and in practice, and thus was illegitimate socialist philosophy for the Communist Party to apply as practical implementation of Socialism in Russia.[15] To politically differentiate themselves from Stalin's communist ideology, within the Party, the Trotskyists called their ideology Bolshevik–Leninism, Trotsky's communist ideology of permanent revolution.

In Marxist political discourse the term "Marxism–Leninism", denoting and connoting the theory and praxis of Stalinism, has two usages: (i) praise of Joseph Stalin, by Stalinists who believe Stalin successfully developed Lenin's legacy; and (ii) criticism of Stalin, by Stalinists who repudiate Stalin's political purges, social-class repressions, and bureaucratic terrorism.[16]

Maoism[edit]

Consequent to the ideological Sino-Soviet split in 1956, the Communist party of each socialist country, the CCP of the People's Republic of China, and the CPSU of the Soviet Union, claimed to be the sole interpreter, heir-and-successor to Marxism–Leninism—and thus the ideological leader of world communism.[17] In China, the official History of the People's Republic of China presents Mao Zedong's practical application and adaptation of the urban philosophy of Marxism–Leninism to the pre-industrial conditions of Chinese society, as a fundamental up-dating of Leninism that is applicable worldwide; thus Maoism is the official state ideology of the People's Republic of China.[18]

The Sino–Albanian split (1972–1978) was caused by Socialist Albania's rejection of the PRC's Realpolitik of the Sino–American rapprochement with the U.S., specifically the Mao–Nixon meeting (1972), which the Stalinist Albanians perceived as an ideological betrayal of Mao's own Three Worlds Theory, which excluded such political relations. To the Albanians, the Chinese rapprochement with the anti-communist U.S. was a lessening of Mao's ideologic and practical commitments to proletarian internationalism.

Modern Marxist–Leninist praxis[edit]

As revolutionary praxis, Maoism is the ideology of communist parties sympathetic to the Communist Party of China. Since the death of Mao Zedong in 1976, the Shining Path (Communist Party of Peru, Sendero Luminoso) coined the term Marxism–Leninism–Maoism, because Maoism is a modern variety of Marxism that is adaptable to local conditions in Third-world South America.[18] In 1977, the native Korean ideology of Juche (self-reliance) replaced Marxism–Leninism as the official state ideology of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. In contemporary socialist states, Marxism–Leninism is the official state ideology of the Republic of Cuba, the Lao People's Democratic Republic and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Marxist–Leninist state[edit]

The Marxist–Leninist state is a one-party state wherein the communist party is the political vanguard who guides the proletariat and the working classes in establishing the foundations (social, economic, cultural) of a socialist state,[19] en route to realising a communist society without social-class warfare (social stratification) and institutional sexism, in which each man and woman works and consumes according to his and her abilities and needs.[20] Socialist government is exercised with the dictatorship of the proletariat, which defines and decides, implements and realises policy through democratic centralism.[21] The administrative offices and posts of government are filled with people elected at the local, regional, and national levels, usually by direct election, however, indirect election also features in the Marxist–Leninist praxis of the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Cuba, and the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1943–1992).[22]

Economic[edit]

The goal of Marxist–Leninist political economy is the emancipation of men and women from the dehumanisation caused by mechanistic work that is psychologically alienating (without work–life balance), which is performed in exchange for wages that give limited financial-access to the material necessities of life (i.e. food and shelter). That personal and societal emancipation from poverty (material necessity) would maximise individual liberty, by enabling men and women to pursue their interests and innate talents (artistic, intellectual, industrial, etc.) whilst working by choice, without the economic coercion of poverty. In the communist society of upper-stage economic development, the elimination of alienating labour (mechanistic work) depends upon the developments of high technology that improve the means of production and the means of distribution.

In 1933, Soviet propaganda encouraged peasants and farmers to "Strengthen working discipline in collective farms", in the Azeri Soviet Socialist Republic (Azerbaijan).

To meet the material needs of a socialist society, the Marxist–Leninist state uses a planned economy to co-ordinate the means of production and of distribution to supply and deliver the goods and services required throughout society and the national economy.[23] The wages of the worker are determined according to the type of skills and the type of work he or she can perform within the national economy.[24] Moreover, the economic value of the goods and services produced is based upon their use value (as material objects) and not upon the cost of production ("value") or the exchange value (marginal utility).[25]

In the 1920s, the Bolshevik government's economic development realised the rapid industrialisation of Russia with pragmatic programs of social engineering that transplanted peasant populations to the cities, where they became industrial workers, who then became the workforce of the new factories and industries. Likewise, the farmer populations worked the system of collective farms to grow food to feed the industrial workers in the industrialised cities. Hence, the Marxist–Leninist society of Russia in the 1930s featured austere equality based upon asceticism, egalitarianism and self-sacrifice—yet the Bolshevik Party recognised human nature and semi-officially allowed some consumerism (limited, small-scale capitalism) to stimulate the economy of Russia.[26]

In Orthodox Marxism, the socialist society originally was equivalent to the communist society. Yet, in the economic praxis of Bolshevik Russia, in defining the differences of political economy, between socialism and communism, Lenin explained their conceptual similarity to Marx's descriptions of the lower-stage and the upper-stage of economic development. That immediately after a proletarian revolution, in the socialist lower-stage society, the practical economy must be based upon the individual labour contributed by men and women; that later, in the communist upper-stage society, the practical economy would be based upon paid labour, in an economy that has realised the social precept of the slogan "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need".[27]

Social[edit]

Bolshevik pro-education propaganda: "In order to have more, it is necessary to produce more. In order to produce more, it is necessary to know more." (1920)

To develop a communist society, the Marxist–Leninist state provides for the national welfare with universal healthcare, free public education (academic, technical, professional), and the social benefits (childcare, continuing education, etc.) necessary to increase the productivity of the workers, and thus the socialist economy.[28] As part of the planned economy, the welfare state is meant to develop the proletariat's education (academic and technical) and their class consciousness (political education) to facilitate their contextual understanding of the historical development of communism, as presented in Marx's theory of history.[29]

The judicial reformation of family law eliminates patriarchy from the legal system, which facilitates the political emancipation of women from traditional social inferiority and economic exploitation.[30] The reformation of civil law made marriage secular, a "free and voluntary union", between persons who are social-and-legal equals; facilitated divorce; legalized abortion, eliminated bastardy ("illegitimate children"); and voided the political power of the bourgeoisie and the private property-status of the means of production. The educational system imparts the social norms for a self-disciplined and self-fulfilling way of life, by which the socialist citizens establish the social order necessary for realizing a communist society.[31]

Cultural policy modernises social relations among the citizenry by eliminating the capitalist value system that divided people into the closed social classes of bourgeois society.[32] The cultural changes required for establishing a communist society are effected through education and agitprop (agitation and propaganda), which reinforce communal values.[33] The purpose of the educational and cultural policies of the Marxist–Leninist state is the elimination of the societal atomisation—anomie and social alienation—caused by cultural backwardness, which facilitates the development of the New Soviet man, an educated and cultured citizen possessed of a proletarian class consciousness who is oriented towards the social cohesion necessary for developing a communist society.[34]

Theological[edit]

In establishing the USSR's policy of official atheism, Stalin ordered the razing of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, in Moscow, in 1931.

The Marxist–Leninist world view is atheist, wherein all human activity results from human volition, and not the will of supernatural beings (gods, goddesses, and demons) who have direct agency in the public and private affairs of human society.[35][36] The tenets of the Soviet Union's national policy of Marxist–Leninist atheism originated from the philosophies of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831) and Ludwig Feuerbach (1804–1872), and of Karl Marx (1818–1883) and Lenin (1870–1924).[37]

As a basis of Marxism–Leninism, the philosophy of materialism (the physical universe exists independently of human consciousness) is applied as dialectical materialism (a philosophy of science and Nature) to examine the socio-economic relations among people and things, as parts of a dynamic, material world that is unlike the immaterial world of Metaphysics.[38][39][40] The Soviet astrophysicist Vitaly Ginzburg said that, ideologically, the "Bolshevik communists were not merely atheists, but, according to Lenin's terminology, militant atheists" in excluding religion from the social mainstream, from education, and from government.[41]

International relations[edit]

The Marxist–Leninist approach to international relations derives from the analyses (political and economic, sociological and geopolitical) that Lenin presented in the essay Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917). Extrapolating from five philosophical bases of Marxism — (i) that human history is the history of class struggle, between a ruling class and an exploited class; (ii) that capitalism creates antagonistic social classes: the exploiters, the bourgeoisie; and the exploited, the proletariat; (iii) that capitalism employs nationalist war to further private economic expansion; (iv) that socialism is an economic system that voids social classes through public ownership, and so will eliminate the economic causes of war; and (v) that once the state (socialist or communist) withers away, so shall international relations wither away because they are projections of national economic forces — Lenin said that the capitalists' exhaustion of domestic sources of investment profit, by way of price-fixing trusts and cartels, then prompts the same capitalists to export investment capital to undeveloped countries to finance the exploitation of natural resources and the native populations, to create new markets. That the capitalists' control of national politics ensures the government's safeguarding of colonial investments and the consequent imperial competition for economic supremacy provokes international wars to protect their national interests.[42]

In the vertical perspective (social-class relations) of Marxism–Leninism, the internal and international affairs of a country are a political continuum, not separate realms of human activity, which is the philosophic opposite of the horizontal perspectives (country-to-country) of the liberal and the realist approaches to international relations. Therefore, colonial imperialism is the inevitable consequence in the course of economic relations among countries when the domestic price-fixing of monopoly capitalism has voided profitable competition in the capitalist homeland. As such, the ideology of New Imperialism—rationalised as a civilising mission—allowed the exportation of high-profit investment capital to undeveloped countries with uneducated, native populations (sources of cheap labour), plentiful raw materials for exploitation (factors for manufacture), and a colonial market to consume the surplus production, which the capitalist homeland cannot consume; the example is the European Scramble for Africa (1881–1914), which was safeguarded by the national military.[42]

To secure the colonies—foreign sources of new capital-investment-profit—the imperialist state seeks either political or military control of the limited resources (natural and human); the First World War (1914–1918) resulted from such geopolitical conflicts among the empires of Europe over colonial spheres of influence.[43] For the colonised working classes who create the wealth (goods and services), the elimination of war for natural resources (access, control and exploitation) is resolved by overthrowing the militaristic capitalist state and establishing a socialist state as a peaceful world economy is feasible only by proletarian revolutions that overthrow systems of political economy based upon the exploitation of labour.[42]

History[edit]

Bolshevism[edit]

The philosophy of Marxism–Leninism originated as the pro-active, political praxis of the Bolshevik (Majority) faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP).[44] Lenin's leadership transformed the Bolsheviks into the political vanguard of the RSDLP, i.e. committed, professional revolutionaries, who elected leaders and determined policy by way of democratic centralism.[45] The Bolsheviks' vanguardism of pro-active, pragmatic commitment to achieving revolution was their advantage in out-manoeuvring Liberal and Conservative political parties that advocated social democracy, without a practical plan of action for the Russian society they wished to govern. Leninism thus allowed the Bolshevik Party to assume command of the October Revolution, in 1917.[45]

February Revolution[edit]

In 1906, after the failed February Revolution of 1905, Tsar Nicholas II addressed the two chambers of the Duma, at the Winter Palace.
The failed February Revolution (1905–1907) against Tsar Nicholas II exiled Lenin from Imperial Russia to Switzerland. (March 1905)

Twelve years before the October Revolution, Lenin and the Bolsheviks had failed to assume control of the February Revolution of 1905, because the centres of revolutionary action were too far apart for proper political co-ordination.[46] To generate revolutionary momentum—from Tsarist Army's killings on Bloody Sunday (22 January 1905)—the Bolsheviks advocated militant action, that the workers use political violence to compel the bourgeois middle classes (the nobility, the gentry, the bourgeoisie) to join the proletarian revolution to overthrow the absolute monarchy of the Tsar of Russia.[47]

Despite their secret-police persecution by the Okhrana (Department for Protecting the Public Security and Order), émigré Bolsheviks returned to Russia to agitate, organise and lead; and when revolutionary fervour failed in 1907, returned to exile (Lenin to Switzerland).[48] The failure of the February Revolution (1905–1907) exiled the Bolsheviks (Majority) and the Mensheviks (Minority), the Socialist Revolutionaries, and the Black Guard anarchists from Russia—a political defeat aggravated by Tsar Nicholas II's agreement to reforming the government of Imperial Russia. In practice, the formalities of political participation — the State Duma, the political plurality of a multi-party system of elections; and the Russian Constitution of 1906 — were the Tsar's piecemeal concessions to social progress, which favoured only the aristocracy, the gentry, and the bourgeoisie with political office; but did not practically resolve the illiteracy, poverty, and malnutrition of the proletarian majority of Russia.[49]

In Swiss exile, Lenin developed Marx's philosophy and extrapolated colonial revolt as a reinforcement of proletarian revolution in Europe.[50] Five years later in 1912, Lenin resolved a factional challenge to his ideological leadership of the RSDLP by the Forward Group in the party by usurping the all-party congress and then transformed the RSDLP into the Bolshevik Party.[51]

The Great War[edit]

As promised to the Russian peoples in October 1917, the Bolsheviks quit Russia's participation in the Great War, on 3 March 1918; unlike the European socialists who chose bellicose nationalism to anti-war internationalism; the philosophic and political break was consequence of the Internationalist–defencist schism among themselves, as Socialists.[52] That ideological betrayal was denounced by a small group of anti-war socialist leaders, including Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht, and Lenin, for failing as Socialists, and forsaking working-class internationalism for patriotic war.[52] To debunk patriotism and national chauvinism, in the essay Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), Lenin explained that capitalist expansion leads to colonial imperialism, which then is regulated with nationalist wars—such as the Great War among the empires of Europe.[53][54]

Late in 1917—to relieve strategic pressures from the Western Front (4 August 1914–11 November 1918)—Imperial Germany impelled Imperial Russia's withdrawal from the war's Eastern Front (17 August 1914–3 March 1918) by sending Lenin and his Bolshevik cohort in a diplomatically-sealed train to realise socialist revolution in Russia.[55]

October Revolution and civil war[edit]

From 4 to 15 January 1919, the Spartacist uprising in the Germany featured urban warfare between the Communist Party of Germany and anti-communists, secretly aided by the Imperial German government.
Béla Kun, leader of the Hungarian Soviet Republic, speaks to supporters during the Hungarian Revolution of 1919

In March 1917, the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II led to the Russian Provisional Government (March–July 1917), who then proclaimed the Russian Republic (September–November 1917). Later, in the October Revolution, the Bolshevik's coup d'état against the Provisional Government resulted in their establishment of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (1917–1991); yet parts of Russia remained occupied by the counter-revolutionary White Movement of Tsarist and anti-communist military commanders who had united to form the White Army to fight the Russian Civil War (1917–1922) against the Bolshevik régime. Despite the White–Red civil war, Russia remained a combatant in the Great War (1914–1918), which the Bolshevik's had quit with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (3 March 1918), which then provoked the Allied Intervention to the Russian Civil War (1918–1925) by the armies of seventeen countries, featuring Great Britain, France, and Italy, the United States and Imperial Japan.[56]

In 1918, the Bolsheviks consolidated government power by expelling the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries from the soviets.[57] The Bolshevik government then established the Cheka secret police to eliminate anti–Bolshevik opposition in Russia. Initial opposition to the Bolshevik régime was strong, for not having resolved the food shortages and material poverty of the Russian peoples, as they had promised in October 1917; from that social discontent, the Cheka reported 118 uprisings, including the Kronstadt rebellion (7–17 March 1921).[57]

Nationalisation and War Communism

The Bolshevik government introduced limited nationalisation of the means of production, which had been private property of the Russian aristocracy during the Tsarist monarchy.[58] To fulfil the promised redistribution of Russia's arable land, Lenin encouraged the peasantry to reclaim their farmlands from the aristocrats and so ensured the peasantry's political loyalty to the Bolshevik Party.[58] In mid-1918, to overcome the civil war's economic interruption, the War Communism policy featured a regulated market, state-control of the means of distribution and the Decree on Nationalisation of large-scale farms, which requisitioned grain to feed industrial workers in the cities and the Red Army in the field, all while fighting the White Army, who was seeking to re-establish the Romanov dynasty as absolute monarchs of Russia.[58] Politically, the forced grain-requisitions discouraged peasants from farming, which resulted in reduced-harvests and food-shortages, which in turn provoked labour strikes and food riots. With the economic chaos—caused by the Bolshevik government's voiding the monetary economy—the Russian people replaced with barter and the black market.[58]

New Economic Policy

In 1921, the New Economic Policy restored some private enterprise to animate the Russian economy. As part of Lenin's pragmatic compromise with external financial interests in 1918, Bolshevik state capitalism temporarily returned 91 per cent of industry to private ownership—until the Soviet Russians learned to operate and administrate said industries.[59][58] In that vein, Lenin explained that developing socialism in Russia would proceed according to the material and socio-economic conditions of Russia and not as described by Marx in the 19th century. Lenin's pragmatic explanation was the following: "Our poverty is so great that we cannot, at one stroke, restore full-scale factory, state, socialist production".[58] To overcome the lack of educated Russians who could operate and administrate industry, Lenin advocated the development of a technical intelligentsia who would propel the industrial development of Russia to self-sufficiency.[46]

The principal obstacles to Russian economic development and modernisation were great material poverty and the lack of modern technology, which conditions orthodox Marxism considered unfavourable to communist revolution; and that agricultural Russia was right for developing capitalism, but wrong for the development of socialism.[46] [60] The 1921–1924 period was tumultuous in Russia, with the simultaneous occurrence of economic recovery, famine (1921–1922) and a financial crisis (1924).[61] By 1924, the Bolshevik government had achieved much economic progress and by 1926 the production levels of the Soviet Union's economy had risen to the production levels registered in 1913.[61]

Revolutionary consequences

Elsewhere, the successful October Revolution in Russia facilitated communist revolution in Imperial Germany and in Hungary during the 1918–1920 period. In Berlin, the German government and their Freikorps mercenaries fought and defeated the Spartacist uprising (4–5 January 1919), which began as a general strike; and in Munich, likewise fought and defeated the Bavarian Soviet Republic (April 1919). In Hungary, the workers proclaimed the Hungarian Soviet Republic (March–August 1919), which was defeated by the royal armies of the Kingdom of Romania and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and the army of Czechoslovakia. In Asia, successful Mongolian communist revolution established the Mongolian People's Republic (1924–1992).

Stalin assumes power[edit]

At his death (21 January 1924), Lenin's political testament ordered the removal of Stalin as General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
Consolidating power, Stalin and his erstwhile ally Nikolai Bukharin joined forces to expel Leon Trotsky from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
In the original photograph (top), accompanied by Kliment Voroshilov and Vyacheslav Molotov, the People's Commissar for Water Transport, Nikolai Yezhov, escorts Stalin during his inspection tour of the White Sea Canal, but in the edited photograph (bottom) Stalin's disfavour had banished Commissar Yezhov from Soviet history, vanished by the Great Purge (1936–1938)
Lenin's warning

In his political testament (December 1922) to the Communist Party, Lenin ordered Stalin removed from being the party's General Secretary and replaced with "some other person who is superior to Stalin only in one respect, namely, in being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite, and more attentive to comrades".[62] At his death on 21 January 1924, Lenin's testament was read aloud to the Central Committee of the party, but enough committeemen believed in Stalin's political rehabilitation in 1923 and ignored Lenin's order to remove Stalin.[62][63]

Power struggle

Consequent to personally spiteful disputes about the praxis of Leninism, to the October Revolution veterans, Lev Kamenev and Grigory Zinoviev, the true, ideological threat to the integrity of the Communist Party was Trotsky—a personally charismatic political-leader; the commanding officer of the Red Army in the civil war; and revolutionary partner of the dead Lenin.[63] To thwart Trotsky's likely election to head the Communist Party, Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev formed a Troika (Triumvirate), wherein Stalin was General Secretary of the Communist Party—the de facto centre of power in the party and the country.[64]

The direction of the Communist Party was decided in the confrontation of politics and personality—between Stalin's Troika and Trotsky—over which Marxist policy to pursue, namely Trotsky's policy of permanent revolution or Stalin's policy of socialism in one country. Permanent revolution featured rapid industrialisation of the economy, the collectivisation of private farmlands and the Soviet Union's promotion of worldwide communist revolution.[65] Socialism in one country featured moderate-pace national development and the establishment of economic and diplomatic relations with other countries in order to increase international trade with and foreign investment in the Soviet Union.[64]

To politically isolate and oust Trotsky from the party, Stalin expediently advocated the politics of socialism in one country—to which he was indifferent.[65] In 1925, the 14th Communist Party Congress approved Stalin's policy and Trotsky was politically defeated as a possible rival leader of the Communist Party and the Soviet Union.[65]

In the 1925–1927 period, Stalin dissolved the Troika and disowned the moderate Kamenev and Zinoviev for an expedient alliance with the equally opportunistic Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov (Premier of Russia, 1924–1929; Premier of the Soviet Union, 1924–1930)[66] and Mikhail Tomsky (leader of the All-Russian Central Council of Trade Unions)—the most right-wing Revolution-era Bolsheviks in the party.[65] The 1927 Communist Party Conference endorsed Stalin's socialism in one country as the national policy for the Soviet Union and expelled Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev from the party's Politburo.[65]

Power consolidated

In 1929, Stalin had assumed control (personal and political) of the Communist Party and the Soviet Union proper by way of deception and administrative acumen.[65] By then, the Stalinist régime of socialism in one country had associated revolutionary Bolshevism with the harsh socio-economic policies that a centralised state required to realise the rapid industrialisation of the cities and the collectivisation of agriculture in Russia as well as to subordinate the national interests of the world's communist parties to the geopolitical interests of the Soviet Communist Party.[45]

In the 1929–1932 period of the first five-year plan, Stalin effected the dekulakization of Russian farmlands, a politically radical and harsh dispossession of the kulak class of peasant-landlords, about which Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky had moderate-action recommendations to ameliorate the policy. Stalin took umbrage and accused them of un-communist betrayals of Marxism and Leninism.[65] From that implicit accusation of ideological deviation, Stalin then accused the three October Revolution veterans of plotting against the party and compelled their resignations from public office and from their posts in the Politburo.[65]

To complete his purge of the Communist Party, Stalin then exiled Trotsky from the Soviet Union in 1929.[65] From 1929 onwards, internal opposition to Stalin's régime created Trotskyism (Bolshevik–Leninism), which was outlawed as ideological deviance from Marxism–Leninism, the state ideology of the Soviet Union.[45]

Power legalised

In the 1929–1941 period, Stalin's elimination of Bolshevik rivals ended democracy in the Communist Party and replaced them with his personal control of the party's institutions.[67] The ranks and files of the Communist Party increased with members from the trade unions and from the factories, whom he controlled because there were no other Bolsheviks to contradict Stalin's version of Marxism–Leninism.[67] In 1936, the Soviet Union adopted a new, political constitution which ended weighted-voting preferences for workers and promulgated universal suffrage for every man and woman older than 18 years of age; and organised the soviets (councils of workers) into two legislatures (Supreme Soviet): (i) the Soviet of the Union (representing electoral districts); and (ii) the Soviet of Nationalities (representing the ethnic groups of the country); and by 1939 he had either killed or expelled from the Communist Party all of the Bolsheviks from the October Revolution era.[67]

Dictator of the Soviet Union

Under guise of governing by the principles of Marxism–Leninism, Stalin's dictatorial régime made the Soviet Union a police state unlike Lenin's socialist state of the Bolshevik period.[68] Extensive personal control over the men who were the Communist Party licensed Stalin to use political violence to eliminate anyone who might be a threat—real, potential, or imagined.[68]

As an administrator, Stalin governed the Soviet Union by controlling the formulation of national policy and delegated implementation to subordinate Communist Party functionaries. Such freedom of action allowed local communist functionaries much discretion to interpret the intent of orders from Moscow, which allowed their corruption.[68] To Stalin, the correction of such abuses of authority and economic corruption were responsibility of the secret police, the NKVD (People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs).[68] With the Great Purge (1936–1938), Stalin rid himself of internal enemies in the party and rid Russia of every counter-revolutionary, reactionary and socially dangerous man and woman who might offer legitimate political opposition to Marxism–Leninism. In the 1937–1938 period, the NKVD arrested 1.5 million people from every stratum of the Communist Party and of soviet society and killed 681,692 people for political reasons.[69] To provide manpower (intellectual and manual) to realise the construction projects for Stalin's rapid industrialisation of Russia, the NKVD established the Gulag system of forced-labour camps for criminal convicts and political dissidents, for artists and intellectuals, for homosexual people and religious anti-communists.[67]

Socialism in one country (1929–1941)[edit]

The metallurgical combine in Magnitogorsk in 1929 demonstrates the Soviet Union's rapid industrialisation in the 1920s and 1930s
Rapid industrialisation

Begun in 1928, Stalin's Five-year plans for the national economy of the Soviet Union achieved the rapid industrialisation (coal, iron and steel, electricity and petroleum, etc.) and the collectivisation of agriculture, [70] which achieved 23.6 per cent collectivisation within one year (1930) and 98.0 per cent collectivisation in 12 years (1941).[71] The five-year plans were prepared in the 1920s, whilst the Soviet government fought the internal Russian Civil War (1917–1922) and repelled the external Allied intervention (1918–1925) to the civil war. As the revolutionary vanguard, the Communist Party organised Russian society to realise rapid industrialisation programs as defence against Western interference with socialism in Bolshevik Russia.[72]

During the 1930s, the rapid industrialisation of the country accelerated the Russians' sociological transition from poverty to relative plenty; from Tsarist serfdom to Communist self-determination, when politically illiterate peasants became politically aware urban citizens.[73] The Marxist–Leninist economic régime modernised Russia from an illiterate, peasant society characteristic of monarchy to a literate, socialist society of educated farmers and industrial workers; the modernisation of Russia reduced unemployment to almost nil.[73]

Social engineering

In 1934, Stalin's development of Soviet society contradicted and then replaced, the social, cultural, and intellectual freedoms of Lenin's Bolshevik period. In education, Socialist progress was replaced with traditional Russian authoritarianism (harsh discipline, school uniforms, etc.), which suppressed pedagogic experimentation and relaxed social conduct in the education of children; mental conformity, rather than intellectual liberty.[74] Culturally, the Russian arts were subordinated to the ideological limitations of socialist realism, a form of Russian patriarchy admired by the traditionalist Stalin.[74] The official atheism of the Soviet Union excluded organised religion from the mainstream of Soviet society and repressed any religious organisation that publicly participated in politics and opposed the official atheism.[74]

International relations

In 1933, the Marxist–Leninist geopolitical perspective was that the Soviet Union was surrounded by capitalist and anti-communist enemies; thus, the election of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party government in Germany initially caused the Soviet Union to sever diplomatic relations that had been established in the 1920s. In 1938, Stalin accommodated the Nazis and the anti-communist West by not defending Czechoslovakia, which allowed Hitler's threat of pre-emptive war for the Sudetenland to annex the land and "rescue the oppressed German peoples" living in Czecho.[75]

To challenge Nazi Germany's bid for European empire and hegemony, Stalin promoted anti-fascist front organisations to encourage European socialists and democrats to join the Russian Communists to fight throughout Nazi-occupied Europe.[75] After Germany bluffed Britain into the Munich Agreement (29 September 1938), which then allowed the German occupation of Czechoslovakia (1938–1945), Stalin adopted pro-German policies for the Soviet Union's dealings with Nazi Germany.[75] In 1939, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany agreed to the Treaty of Non-aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, 23 August 1939) and to jointly invade and partition Poland, by way of which Nazi Germany started the Second World War (1 September 1939).[76]

A Chinese Communist cadre leader addresses survivors of the Long March in 1935
At the Yalta Conference, Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Stalin established the post-war order of the world with geopolitical spheres of influence and hegemony

The Great Patriotic War (1941–1945)[edit]

In the 1941–1942 period of the Great Patriotic War, the German invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa, 22 June 1941) was ineffectively opposed by the Red Army, who were poorly led, ill-trained, and under-equipped; hence fought poorly and suffered great losses of dead-and-wounded soldiers and prisoners of war. Such Soviet military weakness was one consequence of the Great Purge (1936–38) of senior officers and career soldiers.[77] The Wehrmacht's extensive and effective attack threatened the territorial integrity of the Soviet Union, and the political integrity of Stalin's Marxist–Leninist state, because the nationalist, anti-communist, and anti-Soviet populations in the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic, and the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic initially welcomed the Nazis invaders as liberators.

The nationalists' collaboration with the Nazi's lasted until the SS and the Einsatzgruppen began their Lebensraum killings — the Holocaust of the Jewish populations, the local communists, civil and community leaders — to realise the German colonisation of Bolshevik Russia. In response, Stalin ordered the Red Army to fight campaigns of total war against the German invaders who would exterminate Slavic Russia. Hitler's attack against the Soviet Union (Nazi Germany's erstwhile ally) realigned Stalin's political priorities, from the repression of internal enemies to the existential defence against external attack. The pragmatic Stalin then entered the Soviet Union to the Grand Alliance, in common front against the Axis Powers—Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan.

In the continental European countries invaded and occupied by the Axis powers, the native communist party usually led the armed resistance (guerrilla warfare and urban guerrilla warfare) against military occupation. In Mediterranean Europe, the Communist Yugoslav Partisans, led by Tito, effectively resisted the Nazi and Fascist occupation. In the 1943–1944 period, Tito's Partisans liberated territories with Red Army assistance and established the Communist political authority that became the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In Asia, during the Japanese occupation of China, Stalin ordered Mao Zedong that the Communist Party of China temporarily cease the Chinese Civil War (1937–1941), and collaborate with the anti-communist Kuomintang, as the Second United Front, in the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945).

Communist victory

In 1943, the Red Army began to repel the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, especially at the five-month Battle of Stalingrad (23 August 1942–2 February 1943) and at the eleven-day Battle of Kursk (5–16 April 1943); and afterwards repelled the Nazi and Fascist occupation armies from Russia and the countries of Eastern Europe until decisive defeat in Germany proper, with the Berlin Strategic Offensive Operation (16 April–2 May 1945).[78] On concluding the Great Patriotic War (1941–1945), the Soviet Union was a military superpower who had a say in the geopolitical order of the world.[78] In that vein and in accordance with the three-power Yalta Agreement (4–11 February 1945), the Soviet Union purged native Fascist collaborators from the Eastern European countries occupied by the Axis Powers and afterwards installed native Communist governments to establish a geographic buffer-zone of satellite states to protect the borders of Russia.

Cold War (1945–1991)[edit]

On 1 October 1949, Mao Zedong, Chairman of the Communist Party of China, declared the establishment of the People's Republic of China
In June 1961, the Soviet General Secretary, Nikita Khrushchev, met with the U.S. President, John F. Kennedy, whilst effecting the de-Stalinisation of the Soviet Union. His official denunciation of Stalin's cult of personality purged Stalinists from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union; and allowed increased freedom of expression.

Upon Allied victory concluding the Second World War (1939–1945), the expediently suppressed, pre-war geopolitical rivalries and ideological tensions that existed among the Allies resumed, and broke their anti-fascist war-time alliance into the Anti-communist Western Bloc and the Communist Eastern Bloc. The renewed geopolitical competition for regional hegemony resulted in the Cold War (1945–1991) — a protracted state of military and diplomatic tension between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R., which often threatened war.[79]

In Europe, the events that precipitated the Cold War were the Soviet and Yugoslav, Bulgarian and Albanian military interventions to the Greek Civil War (1944–1949), in behalf of the Greek Communists;[80] and the Berlin Blockade (1948–1949) by the Soviet Union. In continental Asia, the event that precipitated the Cold War was the resumption of the Chinese Civil War (1930–34; 1945–1950) fought between the anti-communist Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist Party; after the military defeat of the Kuomintang, and expelling General Chiang Kai-shek to the island of Taiwan, Mao Zedong proclaimed and established the People's Republic of China (1 October 1949).[81]

In Eastern Asia, the Cold War produced the Korean War (1950–1953), the first land-war in continental Asia fought between the Eastern Bloc and the Western Bloc, which resulted from dual origins: (i) the nationalist Koreans' post-war resumption of the Korean Civil War; and (ii) an imperial proxy war for regional hegemony, sponsored by the Soviet Union and the U.S.[82] The international response to the North Korean invasion of South Korea was realised by the United Nations Security Council who voted for war—despite the absent Soviet Union—and authorised the intervention of an international military expedition to expel the northern invaders from the south of Korea, and thus restore the geopolitical status quo ante of the post–WWII division of Korea at the 38th Parallel of global latitude, by the Soviets and the Americans. Consequent to Chinese military intervention in behalf of Communist North Korea, the magnitude of the infantry warfare reached operational and geographic stalemate; afterwards, the shooting war was ended with the Korean Armistice Agreement (27 July 1953); and the superpower Cold War in Asia then resumed as the Korean Demilitarized Zone.

De-Stalinization[edit]

In 1948, Marshal Tito's rejection of Russian hegemony upon the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, provoked Stalin to expel the Yugoslav leader and Yugoslavia from the Eastern bloc of socialist countries.

Socialist Yugoslavia[edit]

The geopolitics of the Eastern bloc countries under the hegemony of Stalinist Russia featured an official-and-personal style of socialist diplomacy that failed Stalin and Tito, and led to the Tito–Stalin Split, when Tito said "No." to subordinating Yugoslavia to Russia. Circumstance and cultural personality aggravated the matter into an official diplomatic break, the Yugoslav–Soviet Split in 1948. The break between the Marxist-Leninist communists, Tito and Stalin, resulted from Tito's rejection of Stalin's political demand that he subordinate Socialist Yugoslavia to the geopolitical agenda (economic and military) of the Soviet Union, i.e. Tito at Stalin's disposal.[83]

Stalin punished Tito's refusal by denouncing the Yugoslav Communist leader as an ideological revisionist of Marxism–Leninism; by denouncing Socialist Yugoslavia's practice of Titoism as socialism deviated from the cause of world communism; and by expelling the Yugoslav communists from the Communist Information Bureau (Cominform). The break from Eastern-bloc Stalinism allowed the development of Titoism, the Yugoslav variety of Marxism–Leninism that allowed doing business with the capitalist West to develop the socialist economy, and the establishment of Socialist Yugoslavia's diplomatic and commercial relations with countries of the Eastern and Western blocs; international relations that matured into the Non-Aligned Movement (1961) of countries without political allegiance to any power bloc.[84]

USSR[edit]

At the death of Stalin in 1953, Nikita Khrushchev became leader of the Soviet Union and of the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union), and then consolidated an anti-Stalinist government. Three years later, in a secret meeting at the 20th congress of the CPSU, Khruschev denounced Stalin and Stalinism in the speech On the Cult of Personality and its Consequences (25 February 1956) in which he specified and condemned Stalin's dictatorial excesses and abuses of power, such as the Great purge (1936–38) and the cult of personality. Khrushchev thus introduced the de-Stalinisation of the Party and of the Soviet Union, which he realised with the dismantling of the Gulag archipelago of forced-labour camps and freeing the prisoners; allowing Soviet civil society greater political freedom of expression, especially for public intellectuals of the Intelligentsia, such as the novelist Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, whose literature obliquely criticised Stalin and the Stalinist police state. De-Stalinization also ended Stalin's national-purpose policy of socialism in one country, which was replaced with proletarian internationalism, by way of which Khrushchev re-committed the Soviet Union to permanent revolution to realise world communism. In that geopolitical vein, Khrushchev presented de-Stalinization as the restoration of Leninism as the official state ideology of the Soviet Union.[85]

Maoism[edit]

In the 1950s, the People's Republic of China developed Maoism (Thought Mao Zedong) as the Chinese development of Marxism–Leninism; the differences between the Russian and Chinese interpretations of the practice of Leninism and Marxism provoked ideological, political, and nationalist tensions derived from the different stages of development of industrialised Russia and of agricultural China. The intractable arguments about ideological orthodoxy and ideological revisionism provoked the Sino-Soviet split (1956–1966), and the PRC and the USSR broke their international relations (diplomatic and political, cultural and economic).[17]

Afterwards, the PRC established détente with the U.S., to challenge the Soviet Union for leadership of the international communist movement. Mao's pragmatism permitted geopolitical rapprochement and facilitated President Richard Nixon's 1972 visit to China, which subsequently ended the two-Chinas policy when the U.S. sponsored the PRC to replace the Republic of China (Taiwan) as representative of the Chinese people at the United Nations; the PRC also became member of the Security Council.[17] In the post–Mao period, the Deng Xiaoping government (1982–1987) effected policies of economic liberalisation that resulted in continual economic growth for the the PRC. The ideological justification is socialism with Chinese characteristics, the Chinese adaption of Russian Marxism–Leninism.[86]

Marxist–Leninist revolution[edit]

Che Guevara and Fidel Castro, leader of the Republic of Cuba (1959–2008)
Viet Cong guerillas during the Vietnam War

In Latin America, Communist revolutions based upon Marxism–Leninism occurred in Bolivia, Cuba, El Salvador, Grenada, Nicaragua, Peru and Uruguay. In 1959, the Cuban Revolution, led by Fidel Castro and Ché Guevara, overthrew the régime (1925–1959) of Fulgencio Batista to establish the Republic of Cuba, a Communist state recognised by the Soviet Union. In response, the United States attempted a coup d'état against the Castro government, such as the unsuccessful Bay of Pigs invasion (April 1961), by anti-communist Cuban exiles, sponsored by the CIA. The next year, there occurred the Cuban missile crisis (October 1962), a diplomatic dispute between the United States and the Soviet Union over the presence of medium-range, Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba. The Soviet Union resolved the nuclear-missile crisis by removing their missiles from Cuba in exchange for the United States removing their nuclear missiles from the Turkey–Soviet Union border. In Bolivia, the Communist revolution included Guevara until his execution by the Bolivian Army. In Uruguay, the Tupamaros movement was active from the 1960s to the 1970s.

In 1970, there occurred the October Crisis in Canada, a brief revolution in the province of Quebec, where the separatist Front de libération du Québec (FLQ) kidnapped James Cross, the British Trade Commissioner in Canada; and Pierre Laporte, the Quebec government minister, who was killed. The FLQ's manifesto condemned English-Canadian imperialism in French Québec and called for a Québecois socialist state. The harsh Canadian government response included suspension of civil liberties in Quebec, which compelled the FLQ leaders' flight to Cuba.

In 1979, Daniel Ortega, leader of the Sandinista National Liberation Front, became head of state of Nicaragua upon winning the Nicaraguan civil war. Within months, the United States government of Ronald Reagan then sponsored the Contras in a secret war (1979–1990) against Nicaragua. In 1983, the United States invasion of Grenada impeded the assumption of power by the New Jewel Movement (1973–1983), a vanguard party led by Maurice Bishop. The Salvadoran Civil War (1979–1992) featured the popularly supported Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front, an organisation of left-wing parties fighting against the right-wing military government of El Salvador.

The Vietnam War (1945–1975) was the second East–West war that occurred in Asia during the Cold War. After the Vietnamese Communists led by Ho Chi Minh defeated the French re-establishment of European colonialism in Viet Nam, the United States replaced France as the Western support of the client-state Republic of Vietnam (1955–1975). Despite military superiority, the United States failed to safeguard South Vietnam from the Viet Cong, the guerrilla army sponsored by North Vietnam. In 1968, North Vietnam launched the Tet Offensive. Although a military failure, the attack was successful psychological warfare that decisively turned international public opinion against the United States intervention to the Vietnamese civil war and five years later eventual United States withdrawal from the war in 1973 and the subsequent Fall of Saigon to the Vietnamese Communists forces in 1975.

Consequent to the Cambodian Civil War and in coalition with Prince Norodom Sihanouk, the native Cambodian Communists, the Maoist Khmer Rouge (1951–1999) led by Pol Pot, established Democratic Kampuchea (1975–1982), a Marxist–Leninist state that featured class warfare to restructure the society of old Cambodia; to be effected and realised with the abolishment of money and private property, the outlawing of religion, the killing of the intelligentsia and compulsory manual labour for the middle classes by way of death-squad state terrorism.[87]

To eliminate Western cultural influence, Kampuchea expelled all foreigners and effected the destruction of the urban bourgeoisie of old Cambodia, first by displacing the population of the capital city (Phnom Penh); and then by displacing the entire national populace to work the farmlands to increase food supplies. Meanwhile, the Khmer Rouge purged Kampuchea of internal enemies (social class and political, cultural and ethnic) at the killing fields, the scope of which became crimes against humanity that destroyed 2, 700, 000 people by mass murder and genocide.[88][89] That social restructuring of Cambodia included attacks against the Vietnamese ethnic minority in Kampuchea, which aggravated the historical, ethnic rivalries between the Viet and the Khmer peoples. Beginning in September 1977, Kampuchea and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam continually engaged in border clashes. In 1978, Vietnam invaded Kampuchea and captured Phnom Penh in January 1979, deposed the Maoist Khmer Rouge from government and established the Cambodian Liberation Front for National Renewal as the government of Cambodia.[89]

In the 1968–1980 period in Africa, Angola, Benin, the Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Somalia and Zimbabwe became Marxist–Leninist states governed by their respective native peoples; Marxist–Leninist guerrillas fought the Portuguese Colonial War in three countries, Angola, Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique; overthrew of the monarchy of Haile Selassie and established the Derg government (1974–1987) of the Coordinating Committee of the Armed Forces, Police and Territorial Army in Ethiopia; Robert Mugabe led the successful civil war to overthrow white-minority rule in Rhodesia (1965–1979) in order to establish Zimbabwe. In South Africa, the anti-communist, white-minority government—based upon the official racism of apartheid—caused much geopolitical tension between the Soviet Union and the United States. In 1976, anti-communism became morally untenable for the West when the South African government killed 176 people (students and adults) in the suppression of the Soweto uprising (June 1976), which protested Afrikaner cultural imperialism, the racist imposition of Afrikaans (a European Germanic language) as the language for teaching school and as the language that black South Africans must speak to white people; and the police assassination in September 1977 of Steven Biko, a leader of the internal resistance to apartheid in South Africa.[90]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Dictionary of Historical Terms (1998) Second Edition, Chris Cook, Ed., pp. 221–222, p. 305.
  2. ^ Dictionary of Historical Terms (1998) Second Edition, Chris Cook, Ed., pp. 221–222.
  3. ^ Albert, Michael; Hahnel, Robin. Socialism Today and Tomorrow. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: South End Press, 1981. pp. 24–25.
  4. ^ Andrain, Charles F. Comparative Political Systems: Policy Performance and Social Change. Armonk, New York, USA: M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1994. p. 140.
  5. ^ Todd, Allan. History for the IB Diploma: Communism in Crisis: 1976–89, p. 16. "The term Marxism–Leninism, invented by Stalin, was not used until after Lenin's death in 1924. It soon came to be used in Stalin's Soviet Union to refer to what he described as 'orthodox Marxism'. This increasingly came to mean what Stalin, himself, had to say about political and economic issues. . . . However, many Marxists (even members of the Communist Party, itself) believed that Stalin's ideas and practices (such as socialism in one country and the purges) were almost total distortions of what Marx and Lenin had said".
  6. ^ The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought (1999) Third Edition, Allan Bullock and Stephen Trombley, Eds., p. 506.
  7. ^ a b Lisischkin, G. (Г. Лисичкин), Novy Mir (Мифы и реальность, Новый мир), 1989, № 3, p. 59 (in Russian).
  8. ^ "Marxism" entry in the Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary.
  9. ^ a b Howard, M.C., King, J.E. "State capitalism" in the Soviet Union" Archived 2 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine..
  10. ^ Lichtenstein, Nelson. "American Capitalism: Social Thought and Political Economy in the Twentieth Century" (2011) University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 160–161
  11. ^ Ishay, Micheline. The Human Rights Reader: Major Political Essays, Speeches, and Documents from Ancient Times to the Present (2007) Taylor & Francis. p. 245.
  12. ^ Todd, Allan. History for the IB Diploma: Communism in Crisis 1976–89, p. 16.
  13. ^ Александр Бутенко (Aleksandr Butenko), Социализм сегодня: опыт и новая теория// Журнал Альтернативы, №1, 1996, pp. 2–22 (in Russian)
  14. ^ Александр Бутенко (Aleksandr Butenko), Социализм сегодня: опыт и новая теория// Журнал Альтернативы, №1, 1996, pp. 3–4 (in Russian).
  15. ^ Лев Троцкий (Lev Trotsky), Сталинская школа фальсификаций, М. 1990, pp. 7–8 (in Russian)
  16. ^ М. Б. Митин (M. B. Mitin). Марксизм-ленинизм (in Russian). Яндекс. Retrieved 18 October 2010.[dead link]
  17. ^ a b c Chambers Dictionary of World History (2000), B.P. Lenman, and T. Anderson, Eds., p. 769.
  18. ^ a b The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought, Third Edition (1999), Allan Bullock and Stephen Trombley, Eds., p. 501.
  19. ^ Shtromas, Alexander, Faulkner, Robert K, and Mahoney, Daniel J. Totalitarianism and the Prospects for World Order: Closing the Door on the Twentieth Century (2003). Lexington Books. p. 18.
  20. ^ A Dictionary of 20th-Century Communism (2009), Silvio Pons and Robert Service, Eds., p. 580.
  21. ^ Albert, Michael and Hahnel, Robin. Socialism Today and Tomorrow (1981) Boston, Massachusetts, USA: South End Press, pp. 24–25.
  22. ^ Pons, p. 306.
  23. ^ Pons, p. 138.
  24. ^ Pons, p. 140.
  25. ^ Pons, p. 139.
  26. ^ Pons, p. 732.
  27. ^ The Oxford Companion to Comparative Politics (2012), Joel Krieger and Craig N. Murphy, Eds. Oxford University Press, p. 218.
  28. ^ A Dictionary of 20th-Century Communism (2010), Silvio Pons and Robert Sevice, Eds., pp. 721–723.
  29. ^ A Dictionary of 20th-Century Communism (2010), Silvio Pons and Robert Sevice, Eds., p. 580.
  30. ^ A Dictionary of 20-th Century Communism (200), Silvio Pons and Robert Service, pp. 854–856.
  31. ^ A Dictionary of 20-the Century Communism (2009) Silvio Pons and Robert Service, Eds., p. 317–319.
  32. ^ Pons, p. 250.
  33. ^ Pons, pp. 250–251.
  34. ^ Pons, p. 581.
  35. ^ Thrower, James. Marxism–Leninism as the Civil Religion of Soviet Society E. Mellen Press, 1992. p. 45.
  36. ^ Kundan, Kumar. Ideology and Political System (2003) Discovery Publishing House, 2003. p. 90.
  37. ^ Slovak Studies, Volume 21. The Slovak Institute in North America. p. 231. "The origin of Marxist–Leninist atheism, as understood in the USSR, is linked with the development of the German philosophy of Hegel and Feuerbach."
  38. ^ "Materialistisk dialektik" Archived 23 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine..
  39. ^ Jordan, Z. A.The Evolution of Dialectical Materialism (1967).
  40. ^ Paul Thomas, Marxism and Scientific Socialism: From Engels to Althusser (London: Routledge, 2008).
  41. ^ Ginzburg, Vitalij Lazarevič, On Superconductivity and Superfluidity: A Scientific Autobiography (2009) p. 45.
  42. ^ a b c Penguin Dictionary of International Relations (1998), Graham Evans and Jeffrey Newnham, Eds. pp. 316–317.
  43. ^ Dictionary of Historical terms (1998), Chris Cook, Ed., p. 221.
  44. ^ Bottomore, pp. 53–54.
  45. ^ a b c d Bottomore, p. 54.
  46. ^ a b c Bottomore, p. 259.
  47. ^ Ulam, p. 204.
  48. ^ Ulam, p. 207.
  49. ^ Ulam, p. 269.
  50. ^ Bottomore, p. 98.
  51. ^ Ulam, pp. 282–83.
  52. ^ a b Anderson, Kevin. Lenin, Hegel, and Western Marxism: A Critical Study (1995) Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Illinois Press, p. 3.
  53. ^ Penguin Dictionary of International Relations (1998), Graham Evans and Jeffrey Newnham, Eds., p. 317.
  54. ^ Cavanagh Hodge, Carl. Encyclopedia of the Age of Imperialism, 1800–1914, Volume 2 (2008) Westport, Conn., USA: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. p. 415.
  55. ^ Beckett, Ian Frederick William. 1917: beyond the Western Front (2009) Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV. p. 1.
  56. ^ Lee, p. 31.
  57. ^ a b Lee, p. 37.
  58. ^ a b c d e f Lee, p. 38.
  59. ^ Dictionary of Historical Terms Second Edition (1998), Chris Cook, Ed., p. 306.
  60. ^ Ulam, p. 249.
  61. ^ a b Lee, p. 39.
  62. ^ a b Lee, p. 41.
  63. ^ a b Lee, pp. 41–42.
  64. ^ a b Lee, p. 42.
  65. ^ a b c d e f g h i Lee, p. 43.
  66. ^ "Aleksey Ivanovich Rykov biography —Archontology". Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
  67. ^ a b c d Lee, p. 49.
  68. ^ a b c d Lee, p. 47.
  69. ^ Pons, p. 447.
  70. ^ Hobsbawm, Eric. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991 (1996), pp. 380–81
  71. ^ Lee, p. 60.
  72. ^ Lee, p. 59.
  73. ^ a b Lee, p. 62.
  74. ^ a b c Lee, p. 63.
  75. ^ a b c Lee, p. 74.
  76. ^ Lee, pp. 74–75.
  77. ^ Lee, p. 80.
  78. ^ a b Lee, p. 81.
  79. ^ Dictionary of Historical Terms, Second Edition, Chris Cook, Ed. pp. 69–70.
  80. ^ Dictionary of Wars Third Edition (2007) George Childs Kohn, Ed., p. 216.
  81. ^ Dictionary of Wars Third Edition (2007) George Childs Kohn, Ed., pp. 121–22.
  82. ^ Dictionary of Wars Third Edition (2007) George Childs Kohn, Ed., pp. 291–92.
  83. ^ A 20th-Century Dictionary of Communism (2006), Silvio Pons and Rbvert Service, Eds. p. 800.
  84. ^ A 20th-Century Dictionary of Communism (2006), Silvio Pons and Rbvert Service, Eds. p. 585.
  85. ^ The Cold War: The United States and the Soviet Union, 1917–1991, by Ronald E. Powaski. Oxford University Press, 1997.
  86. ^ Priestland, David. The Red Flag: A History of Communism (2009), pp. 502–503
  87. ^ The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern THought Third Edition (1999), Allan Bullock and Stephen Trombley, Eds., p. 458.
  88. ^ The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought Third Edition (1999), Allan Bullock and Stephen Trombley, Eds., p. 458.
  89. ^ a b Dictionary of Historical Terms, Second Edition (1998) Chris Cook, Ed., pp. 192–193
  90. ^ Dictionary of Historical Terms, Second Edition (1998) Chris Cook, Ed., pp. 13–13

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]